Back in 2012, roughly 15-20% of airport website traffic was coming from smartphones and tablets. In 2013 I watched it move to around 25%. Now it's easily over 50%.
That's no surprise, people pull out their phone when they travel, not their PC.
In 2015 and again in 2016 I compared 100 major global airport websites to see how many of them were mobile friendly. These airports range from servicing 2 million to over 90 million passengers a year.
60 of the airports had a mobile friendly website in 2015 and that grew to 67 in 2016.
33 still have a website that is impossible or close-to-impossible to use on a smartphone.
And of those that were 'mobile friendly', many were still painfully difficult to use. It's one thing to be mobile friendly, but it's another to be traveller friendly. Having a mobile friendly website solves one part of the puzzle but making it work for customers who are on the move is another.
Wondering whether it's smaller airports that are more likely to be at fault?
I found it was more common for those serving 30 to 50 million passengers a year to not have one (17 of 25 didn't).
Of the 20 airports that serve over 50 million passengers per year, 8 did not have a mobile friendly website (including the 3 busiest on my list).
Smaller airports scored better. 16 of the 21 airports that served under 10 million passengers a year had a mobile friendly website.
How easy is your website for your customers to use?
I hope you enjoy issue 1 of this newsletter and find it useful. Can't see graphs and images? Please click view in your browser.
Cheers, Michael Meloni
What things improve passenger experience
Results of the IATA 2016 Global Passenger survey were released last week and it emphasises that complaints from airline passengers are up from 2015 (and up 60% from 2013).
The answer? "Travelers expect a connected experience across their physical and digital experience, that is personalized and provides them the same conveniences in flight, as on the ground."
Sure, they also just want their flight to leave and arrive on time and their bag to make it with them.
Assuming that's achieved, what aspects according to the 2016 survey will improve passenger experience the most?
Those aged under 45 all stressed some element of technology as the one thing that would improve their travel experience. For those 45 and over it was an attentive cabin crew. I'll take both.
Aeromexico uses Donald Trump's creative tongue to their advantage
Check out this Aeromexico front page ad shown to US travellers. Bad hombre's, great deals. Who doesn't want to save bigly.
Getting the branding right for a large, highly political transport project is a no brainer and as you can see from this case, Melbourne Metro is having a bit of an identity crisis.
Nick Careen, Senior VP of Airport, Passenger, Cargo and Security for IATA, on a crucial element missing from passenger experience: measurement of the entire process.
51% of passengers want to be fully connected to the Internet during their flights. Now imagine how many want to be connected to WiFi in your airport. 80%? 90%? 100%?
What a disaster for Samsung. The Galaxy Note7 smartphone was banned by most airlines and airports helped spread the word. In this case, bad press is bad press.
Last month Uber introduced scheduled trips for Australian users. Travellers can now prebook an Uber hours or days or weeks in advance of their flight. Previously it was always a little risky hoping there was an Uber available in the early morning before a flight. Uber (and other ride sharing) is here to stay, how is your airport dealing?